Ten (or about that many) articles from 2008 worth reading and remembering. They’re not necessarily my favorites, they don’t necessarily reflect my opinion, they’re not necessarily groundbreaking works of flawless journalism, but they are the pieces that come to mind at year’s end.
The Unstudied Art of Interrogation by Scott Shane. The New York Times, March 8, 2008.
Mr. Kleinman said he envisioned a new intelligence agency or subagency devoted solely to interrogation — sponsoring research, conducting training and building a team of sophisticated interrogators with linguistic and psychological skills. He speaks of creating a high-level interrogation center in the United States where settings could be customized for a particular suspect, Hollywood-style, “whether it’s a Bedouin tent or a suite at the Waldorf.”
Who Says Women Aren’t Funny? by Alessandra Stanley. Vanity Fair, April 2008.
Comedy has changed on sitcoms, in clubs, and on Saturday Night Live. The repertoire of women isn’t limited to self-loathing or man-hating anymore; the humor is more eclectic, serene, and organic. ‘The consciousness changed’ is how Lorne Michaels explains the difference.
Prison Puppies by Joseph Berger. The New York Times, June 1, 2008.
The tender mercy here is that a dog does not know the difference between a prisoner and a model citizen. It responds to kindness, firmness, patience and consistency.
A Diverse Brooklyn, With Meatballs by Mike Albo. The New York Times, July 3, 2008.
Ikea has become a lodestone for heated discussion about the future of this village, and Brooklyn in general. Google “Ikea Brooklyn,” and you find a flurry of blogs, Web sites and organizations contending that the Ikea project forced unfair changes in the zoning rules, broke environmental laws during construction and, in a cultural sense, bleeds Brooklyn of its character and charm . . . But walking through the maze of home furnishings, I saw what I love about Brooklyn: everyone.
Can green be groovy? Economist.com, July 21, 2008.
There are several drawbacks to the flaky, faddish school of greenery. The first is that trends come and go, yet the planet will still need saving if Dr. Earth and his ilk decide they are more interested in macramé or tae kwon do.
Black and Blacker: The Racial Politics of The Obama Marriage by Vanessa Grigoriadis. New York magazine, August 10, 2008.
At the [Sidley Austin law] firm, Michelle was assigned to be Barack’s mentor, but she began with suspicions. “Everyone was raving about this smart, attractive, young first-year associate they had recruited from Harvard,” she’s said. “Everyone was like, ‘Oh, he’s brilliant.’ I said, ‘Okay, this is probably just a brother who can talk straight.’ ”
Stop, Thief! by John Colapinto. The New Yorker, September 1, 2008.
[Brad] Brekke had the revolutionary idea of creating a crime lab inside [Target’s] office headquarters.
The Falling Man by Tom Junod. Esquire Magazine, September 11, 2008.
Some people who look at the picture see stoicism, willpower, a portrait of resignation; others see something else — something discordant and therefore terrible: freedom . . . He is, fifteen seconds past 9:41 a.m. EST, the moment the picture is taken, in the clutches of pure physics . . . In the picture, he is frozen; in his life outside the frame, he drops and keeps dropping until he disappears.
Thumbspeak by Louis Menand. The New Yorker, October 20, 2008.
[David] Crystal’s answer is that texting is, partly, a game. It’s like writing a sonnet (well, sort of): the requirement is to adapt the message to immutable formal constraints. A sonnet can’t have more than fourteen lines, and a mobile-phone message can’t have more than a hundred and forty bytes, which is usually enough for a hundred and sixty characters. This is a challenge to ingenuity, not an invitation to anarchy.
Never Let Them See You Sweat by Kate Zernike. The New York Times, November 29, 2008
People tend to think that the confrontation produces the reaction; if you’re faced with an irrational rant, who can blame you for falling apart? But researchers in emotional regulation tease out a factor in between: how we think. Between the “a” of the antecedent and the “c” of the consequence, they argue, is the crucial “b,” for belief, which in the case of the person melting down might sound something like: my boss hates me, everyone hates me, I’m a total failure.
That is the opportunity for emotional regulation.
Bargain Hunting for Books, And Feeling Sheepish About It by David Streitfield. The New York Times, December 27, 2008.
‘With the Internet, nothing is ever lost,’ Ms. Lesser said. ‘That’s the good news, and that’s the bad news.’